Estudo da argumentação sob uma perspectiva textual e retórica

Abstract

This research aims to suggest, from the inspiration of Pinto proposal (2010), a theoretical and methodological model to analyze the argument in verbal texts that can be considered situational aspects (Elements External arguing), textual (Component Generic , Sequential Component) and rhetorical (Component Rhetorical). Starting from the Pinto findings (2010) and Maingueneau (2001), we argue that the Foreign arguing elements would be a number of socio-historical aspects (larger context) and situational communication (specific context) that interfere in the choice of speakers, as well as produce constraints on genres. Under this view, the textual design of the argument concerns the Generic Component, following the proposal of Bakhtin (1997), and Sequential component, following the influence of Adam (1992; 2008). The Rhetorical component would be to analyze the schematics (ADAM, 2008) resulting from the textual sequential, which triggers the projection of the Speaker of the image in speech (MAINGUENEAU, 2002) and argumentative techniques (PERELMAN; Tyteca, 1996), able to persuade interlocutors . Methodologically, we selected a corpus of 20 political speeches Session of Representatives Chamber of the Plenary on "monthly allowance", the apply the model in two texts that are in dialogue with each other (the speaker speech leader of the PT in the House and speech Announcer leader of the PSDB in the House), noting the differences and approaches from the point of view of the construction of the argument. The results indicate that the formation of the Speaker of the images in the speech possible accession (or not) to those undertaken theses. For this to be implemented effectively, it is essential that the Speaker seek argumentative techniques to provide the adhesions, which becomes fundamental for the analysis of elements external to the text, as well as the influences that genres and textual sequences that constitute They provide in the argument.