Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/68292
Type: | Artigo de Periódico |
Title: | Ranking product systems based on uncertain life cycle sustainability assessment: a stochastic multiple criteria decision analysis approach |
Other Titles: | Ranqueamentos de sistemas de produtos baseado na avaliação da sustentabilidade do ciclo de vida: tomada de decisão estocástica baseada em múltiplos critérios |
Authors: | Carmo, Breno Barros Telles do Margni, Manuele Baptiste, Pierre |
Keywords: | Life cycle sustainability assessment;Multiple criteria decision analysis;Uncertainty;Decision - Making |
Issue Date: | 2020 |
Publisher: | Revista de Administração da UFSM |
Citation: | CARMO, B. B. T.; MARGNI, M.; BAPTISTE, P. Ranking product systems based on uncertain life cycle sustainability assessment: a stochastic multiple criteria decision analysis approach. Revista de Administração da UFSM, vol. 13, n. 4, p. 850-874, out./dez. 2020. DOI: 10.5902/1983465955294 |
Abstract: | Purpose – Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) provides useful and comprehensive information on product system performance. However, it poses several challenges for decision-making process due to (i) multidimensional indicators, (ii) conflicting objectives and (iii) uncertainty associated with the performance assessment. This research proposes an approach able to account uncertain life cycle sustainability performances through multiple criteria decision analysis (MCDA) process to support decision-making. Design/methodology/approach – Our method is structured in three phases: i) assessing the uncertainty of LCSA performances, ii) propagating LCSA uncertainty into MCDA methods and iii) interpreting the stochastic results. The approach is applied on an illustrative case study, ranking four alternatives to biodiesel supply. Findings –The recommendation generated by this approach provides an information about the confidence the decision maker can have in a given result (ranking of solutions) under the form of a probability, providing a better knowledge of the risk (in this case due to the uncertainty of the preferred solution). As such, stochastic results, if appropriately interpreted, provide a measure of the robustness of the rankings generated by MCDA methods, overcoming the limitation of the overconfidence of deterministic rankings. Originality/value – The fundamental contributions of this paper are to (i) integrate LCSA uncertainty into decision-making processes through MCDA approach; (ii) provide a sensitivity analysis about the MCDA method choice, (iii) support decision-makers’ preference choices through a transparent elicitation process and (iv) provide a practical decision-making platform that accounts simultaneously uncertain LCSA performances with stakeholders’ value judgments. |
URI: | http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/68292 |
ISSN: | 1983-4659 |
Appears in Collections: | DEPR - Artigos publicados em revistas científicas |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020_art_bbtcarmo.pdf | 945,42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.