Categorização e análise pragmática da competência francesa para o analista do comportamento nas organizações

Abstract

The French racing is a relatively new trend and there are few papers written about this subject, since most of the studies produced which speak of competence refer to the current American racing. The aim of this study is to categorize the concept of French jurisdiction (CF) to analyze the usefulness of this concept as an instrument or a tool for the analyst 's behavior in organizations, using for this pragmatists propositions used as a reference analysis. In other words, it is intended to evaluate the instrumental value (practical) of the French concept of competence in the field of behavior analysis (CA) applied to organizations. Thus, to meet the objectives of this work, a conceptual survey was conducted around the CF and then operationalized conceptually chain of CF, with its definition and essential characteristics through five categories of analysis of CF: 1 - Synergistic Combinations CHA; 2 - Focus on Performance; 3 - Training and qualification; 4 - Add value to the organization and the individual; 5 - Related to the changing situation in work. Made this definition, a discussion between the CF theory and theory of behavior analysis was performed by analyzing the feasibility (practical consequences) in practice the analyst 's behavior in organizations. As a result, there was some similar theoretical parameters between the theories: 1 - in the operationalization of performance in terms of action; 2 - from the perspective of the natural phenomenon of competence; 3 - the functionalist and relational bias between the performance delivered and organization, while promoting and sustaining these developments. A From these results, we conclude the feasibility of using the CF behavior analyst in the organization.