Análise comparativa entre plataformas de desenvolvimento low-code para web

Abstract

"Given the financial constraints and the shortage of IT specialists, many companies face difficulties in developing agile software solutions. In this context, low code development platforms emerge as an effective solution, enabling the rapid creation of software without requiring extensive programming knowledge. In addition to facilitating the development of MVPs, these platforms are widely used to create more robust applications, capable of scaling and meeting business demands in different contexts. However, even with a reduced scope, creating an MVP can be complex and require significant time from the development team. This work presents a comparative analysis of various development platforms, focusing on web application development. The methodology adopted in this work includes the implementation of an MVP in platforms such as Adalo, Bubble, FlutterFlow, and Outsystems, evaluated by criteria such as usability, customization, scalability, and ease of implementation. The results indicate that Adalo is more suitable for smaller projects due to its simplicity, while Bubble offers flexibility but has limitations regarding code export. FlutterFlow stands out for its customization and the possibility of exporting source code, making it ideal for larger-scale projects. Outsystems excels in large corporate projects, although it requires a steeper learning curve. It is concluded that the choice of platform depends on the specific needs of each project. Future work suggests expanding the analysis to include other platforms and exploring the integration of these tools with emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence and process automation.