Critérios classificatórios para processos intertextuais

Abstract

Leaving the conjecture that the different types that are known as intertextuality can be taken from an integral perspective, the goal of this research is to organize a theoretical framework on which the various types of intertextuality which are in a state of dispersion are systematized. For this purpose, it was necessary to discuss the main approaches of the phenomenon: the transtextuality of Genette ([1982] 2010), the copresence and the derivation of Piègay-Gros ([1996] 2010), also seen about Cavalcante’s approach (2012), the paraphrastic and parodistic axes of Sant’Anna (2007), and the types of Koch (2004). Collated all these approaches, it became evident that the great typological variety existing revealed, more than a mere matter of terminology floating, the consideration of different and simultaneous underlying parameters intertextual resources, so that the construction of the theoretical framework was based on the recognition and organization of these parameters. As a result of reflections, it is possible to conclude that there are two essential parameters to any intertextual phenomenon: a functional, that assesses the degree of uptake or subversion of intertext to the original text; and a constitutional, where there is the intertext comes from resources of a single text or multiple one. Depending on the constitutional nature of intertextuality, there is the occurrence of three parameters: the compositional, which distinguishes this intertextuality in fragments or in full text; the referential, that evaluates the degree of explicitness or implicitness of the intertext; and the formal, that demonstrates how the original texts are reproduced in new texts, whether by reproduction, adaptation or mention.