A responsabilidade subjetiva na psicanálise lacaniana

Abstract

This paperwork had the objective investigate how to configure the discussion about the subjective responsibilities on psychoanalysis of Lacanian orientation. Before the wide theoretical production of Jacques Lacan, the psychoanalysts' readings were investigated from the work of the French psychoanalyst. In order to adapt to the research object, it was used as a method of reserch a deconstructive hermeneurics allied to misreading. Resorting the main bibliographic references, it was possible to establish three ways of putting the discussion. The first one, most recurrent, is the proposal of subjective errand, in which the unconscious is taken as an attribute for which the analysand must make itself responsible. The second one claims that there isn't theorization of subjective responsibility within the Lacanian theory. The argument proposes that Lacan wasn’t convoke the analysts to take responsibility subjectively themselves, but to know how to conceive and respond to the concept of the subject. The third perspective of the debate is based of not to make an individualistic reading of the problem of responsibility. From the third proposition, it is essential that commitment in Lacanian psychoanalysis be collective.