http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/23911 Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:49:37 GMT 2026-07-15T15:49:37Z http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86899 Título: CNJ e políticas judiciárias de ressocialização: educação, trabalho e redução da reincidência no sistema prisional cearense Autor(es): Abreu, Wesley Nogueira de Abstract: This study examines the role of the National Council of Justice (Conselho Nacional de Justiça – CNJ) in promoting judicial policies aimed at social reintegration, with particular emphasis on education, prison labor, and structural measures designed to reduce criminal recidivism, based on an empirical analysis of the prison system in the State of Ceará. Initially, the research addresses the historical evolution of criminal punishment and the consolidation of imprisonment as the central instrument of the penal system, contextualizing the emergence of the Brazilian Criminal Enforcement Law and the constitutional principles of human dignity, individualization of punishment, and the rehabilitative purpose of the sentence. Subsequently, it discusses the structural framework of fundamental rights violations that characterizes the Brazilian prison system, as evidenced by the recognition, by the Federal Supreme Court, of the Unconstitutional State of Affairs in the judgment of ADPF No. 347. The study adopts a qualitative methodology, grounded in doctrinal review and normative, jurisprudential, and documentary analysis, with particular attention to CNJ reports and official data on prison overcrowding, criminal recidivism, and penal enforcement policies. The findings indicate that the prison crisis stems from structural factors such as chronic overcrowding, unhealthy custodial conditions, insufficient material and psychosocial assistance, the fragility of intramural public policies, and the administrative weaknesses of Community Councils, all of which undermine the constitutional purposes of punishment. The research highlights that the CNJ plays a decisive role as an inductive and coordinating body for judicial reintegration policies, through initiatives such as criminal procedural task forces, the implementation of the Unified Electronic System for Penal Execution (SEEU), the dissemination of the Nelson Mandela Rules, the strengthening of Community Councils, the promotion of Restorative Justice, and the execution of programs such as Fazendo Justiça and the Pena Justa Plan. It concludes that education, professional training, prison labor, psychosocial support, and institutional coordination are essential elements for reducing recidivism and expanding concrete opportunities for social reintegration, particularly in the context of Ceará, where relevant advances coexist with persistent structural challenges. Finally, the study argues that the consolidation of judicial reintegration policies requires coordinated action among the Judiciary, the Executive Branch, and civil society, supported by continuous monitoring, adequate public investment, and the strengthening of participatory institutions, especially Community Councils. Tipo: TCC Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86899 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86898 Título: O Modelo decisório do STF: déficit de deliberação, colegialidade e a formação dos precedentes Autor(es): Andrade Filho, Walber Santos de Abstract: This study examines the democratic legitimacy of Brazilian constitutional adjudication through the lens of the Federal Supreme Court’s (STF) deliberative performance, investigating the extent to which the seriatim decision-making model, marked by the juxtaposition of individual opinions, undermines collegial rationality and the integrity of precedent. The research adopts a theoretical-analytical and bibliographical methodology, grounded in deliberative democratic theory and the doctrine of judicial precedent, to diagnose how the current practice of aggregating individual preferences obstructs the formation of a coherent institutional will. The findings indicate that the “eleven islands” culture, combined with the rapporteur’s unilateral powers and the dynamics of the Virtual Plenary, produces fragmentation of the ratio decidendi, complicating the identification of determinative grounds and weakening legal certainty. The study concludes that institutional reforms are required to foster a transition towards a more deliberative model, with incentives for genuine argumentative exchange and a preference for judgments delivered in a unified institutional voice (per curiam) or through a majority opinion, so as to ensure that the Court functions as a true court of precedents capable of offering public reasons that are universalizable and stable within the legal order. Tipo: TCC Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86898 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86897 Título: Análise multidimensional da violência processual contra as mulheres no Brasil Autor(es): Guimarães, Vivian Marina Araujo Abstract: The national legal culture is permeated by gender stereotypes that enable the reproduction of gender inequalities and discrimination against women. The notion that justice is neutral and impartial is merely illusory, given that judges are not immune to such biases and therefore tend to replicate them, whether consciously or unconsciously, in their judicial assessments. In this context, the phenomenon of procedural violence against women emerges. This study seeks to perceive the various nuances of this form of violence by examining the lived reality of both female litigants and female legal professionals. Furthermore, it highlights how the entrenchment of gender stereotypes within the Judiciary, combined with the omission of judges and other court personnel in the face of aggressions directed at women during legal proceedings, fosters the persistence of a discriminatory and unequal legal culture. In light of this, it should be noted that the Protocol for Judging with a Gender Perspective, issued by the National Council of Justice (CNJ) to reverse this forensic context, is of particular relevance, as it aims to promote judicial education and awareness on gender-related issues. Considering these concerns, the primary objective of this research is to understand the phenomenon of procedural violence, across its various dimensions, against women within the Brazilian Judiciary. To this end, a qualitative approach was adopted, aimed at analyzing the national judicial reality through bibliographic research, encompassing books, articles, journals, and relevant legislation. The study concludes that procedural violence against women arises from a legal culture still marked by gender stereotypes, which allows aggressions to occur within judicial proceedings and influences both judicial decision-making and the conduct of other court actors. Within this scenario, the Protocol for Judging with a Gender Perspective proves to be an essential tool for promoting structural change by establishing guidelines for more gender-sensitive and equitable decisions. Tipo: TCC Thu, 01 Jan 2026 00:00:00 GMT http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86897 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86896 Título: Constelação familiar no judiciário: uma análise crítica sobre sua legitimidade e compatibilidade com direitos fundamentais Autor(es): Ferreira, Vitória Alves Abstract: This study critically examines the use of family constellation practices within the Brazilian Judiciary, taking into account their lack of scientific validation and the risks posed to the legitimacy of judicial proceedings. The research begins with an analysis of the constitutional foundations of procedural law, particularly due process, legal certainty, and judicial impartiality, demonstrating that these principles are incompatible with methods that introduce subjective and non-verifiable elements into decision making. It then investigates the origins, central concepts, and theoretical structure of family constellation practices, highlighting their characterization as pseudoscience due to metaphysical assumptions and the absence of methodological rigor. The study also analyzes how this technique has been incorporated into judicial contexts, identifying normative inconsistencies, lack of regulation, and potential violations of fundamental rights, especially in cases involving vulnerability or violence. Furthermore, it discusses the social and institutional risks associated with the method, as well as recent positions adopted by the National Council of Justice, the Federal Council of Psychology, and other entities that have expressed opposition to its use. The study concludes that family constellation practices do not satisfy the constitutional requirements that structure jurisdiction and therefore should not be employed as judicial instruments. Tipo: TCC Wed, 01 Jan 2025 00:00:00 GMT http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86896 2025-01-01T00:00:00Z