<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19691" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/19691</id>
  <updated>2026-04-18T14:53:41Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-18T14:53:41Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>O pressuposto estético-linguístico do conhecimento: a crítica epistemológica de Walter Benjamin no Caderno N das passagens</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85295" />
    <author>
      <name>Silva, Paulo Victor de Albuquerque</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85295</id>
    <updated>2026-03-10T18:55:44Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: O pressuposto estético-linguístico do conhecimento: a crítica epistemológica de Walter Benjamin no Caderno N das passagens
Autor(es): Silva, Paulo Victor de Albuquerque
Abstract: This thesis investigates Walter Benjamin's critique of knowledge, focusing on the “N Convolute – Theory of Knowledge, Theory of Progress” from “Das Passagen-Werk”. It proceeds from the hypothesis that the Benjaminian epistemology is grounded in a dual and inseparable aesthetic-linguistic premise, according to which historical knowledge emerges from the correlation between sensory apprehension (aesthetics) and interpretative&#xD;
understanding (language). The investigation is developed along three main axes: 1) the expansion of the concept of aesthetics beyond the philosophy of art, situating it as a cognitive dimension of sensory experience in the modern metropolis; 2) the formulation of a Benjaminian philosophy of language that articulates semantics, pragmatics, and materialist hermeneutics; and 3) the immanent analysis of “Convolute N” where this dual foundation is&#xD;
consolidated as the basis of the historical materialist method. In its conclusion, the study critically situates Benjamin’s contribution within the 20th-century epistemological landscape, establishing a brief critical dialogue with three paradigms – the paradigm of consciousness, logical positivism, and orthodox materialism – re-evaluated through the aesthetic-linguistic prism, culminating in the formulation of the “philological historical materialism” as a theoretical synthesis that integrates historicity, language, and sensibility. It concludes that the epistemological turn operated by Benjamin – by decentralizing the transcendental subject and rooting knowledge in sensible-linguistic material objectivity – offers an original paradigm for understanding both the 19th-century modernity and the cognitive impasses of the contemporary world.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A possibilidade de conhecimento na Filosofia Procleana</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/84403" />
    <author>
      <name>Cunha, Suelen Pereira da</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/84403</id>
    <updated>2026-01-21T16:34:29Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: A possibilidade de conhecimento na Filosofia Procleana
Autor(es): Cunha, Suelen Pereira da
Abstract: Characterized by circularity, Proclus’philosophy is grounded in unity as the first cause that&#xD;
is imparticipable and unknowable. Faced with this feature, the presente study adresses the&#xD;
problem of how it is possible to know the diferente hypostases, given that knowledge is&#xD;
defined as knowledge of causes, while the first cause itself is unknowable. Drawing on the&#xD;
selected theoretical framawork, the work unfolds over six chapters. The first explores&#xD;
Proclus’interpretation of Plato’s Parmenides, highlighting both differences and similarities,&#xD;
and showing how the Diadoch’s system takes shape from a logical dialogue. The second&#xD;
chapter deepens the central problema by examining the imparticipable and unknowable&#xD;
dimensions of the first cause, as well as the posible ways of speaking about and&#xD;
apprehending it. The chapter three focus on the hypostases of the noûs and the soul,&#xD;
outlining their fundamental categories, since upon them rest the essential modes of human&#xD;
being and knowing. In chapter, Proclus’system is presented as a network of relations&#xD;
grounded in the movement of procession. The four chapter turns to matter, treated as the&#xD;
final term of the Proclean system, and considers how it relates to the other hypostases,&#xD;
showing that it, too, is integrated into the movement os procession and thus has a share in&#xD;
the One. The fifth chapter adresses the types of apprehension of reality, emphasizing that&#xD;
knowledge constitutes a specific modes of apprehension linked to human participation in&#xD;
the soul and noûs. Finally, the sixth chapter examines the nature of the human,&#xD;
demonstrating that humanity encompasses all the hypostases and mirrors the entire&#xD;
Proclean system. By likeness, then, the human being is capable of knowing every&#xD;
hypostasis. In concludes that knowledge is indeed posible for human beings, precisely&#xD;
because of their likeness to each of the system’s hypostases.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Uma defesa do realismo científico diante do empirismo construtivo</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/84371" />
    <author>
      <name>Esteves, Renan Soares</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/84371</id>
    <updated>2026-01-20T17:21:18Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Uma defesa do realismo científico diante do empirismo construtivo
Autor(es): Esteves, Renan Soares
Abstract: Constructive empiricism is considered the main form of antirealism in the context of&#xD;
the debate about belief in the approximate truth of our best scientific theories.&#xD;
According to this conception, formulated by Bas van Fraassen, the acceptance of a&#xD;
scientific theory does not involve belief in its truth. Furthermore, for this antirealist, there&#xD;
is no justification for belief in unobservable entities and processes, that is, those that&#xD;
cannot be perceived in any way by our senses without the aid of instruments, such as&#xD;
electrons and genes. In this context, the objective of this thesis is to analyze whether&#xD;
it is possible to defend a moderate version of scientific realism even in the face of&#xD;
constructive empiricism. Specifically, it aims to evaluate whether Bas van Fraassen's&#xD;
antirealist position withstands the criticisms directed at it by renowned philosophers of&#xD;
science, such as Stathis Psillos and Anjan Chakravartty. To this end, several&#xD;
collections containing objections to van Fraassen's antirealism are examined, such as&#xD;
those by Paul Churchland and Clifford Hooker (1985), Andreas Berg-Hildebrand and&#xD;
Christian Suhm (2006), and Bradley Monton (2007). Following this, a realist proposal&#xD;
is developed in response to constructive empiricism, which seeks to base itself&#xD;
primarily on the achievements of Biology, attempting to demonstrate that, despite the&#xD;
limitations of scientific knowledge, we are still justified in believing in the existence of&#xD;
some unobservable entities, or at least in the existence of entities similar to those that&#xD;
biologists consider to be investigating. Thereby, it is not viable to adopt an agnostic&#xD;
stance towards the entire unobservable domain of nature. To this end, arguments are&#xD;
articulated that seek to bring innovations by relating the discussion of realism to the&#xD;
scientific practice of biologists, citing as evidence for this belief: the effect of vaccination&#xD;
on the Covid-19 pandemic, the causal power of antibiotics, and the advances in genetic&#xD;
manipulation resulting from the development of molecular biology. Based on such&#xD;
scientific achievements, it is argued that realism is the best, or even the only, way to&#xD;
interpret and explain such successes in the practice of biological science.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Forma-de-vida e técnicas de si: problemas colocados à subjetividade a partir do pensamento de Michel Foucault e Giorgio Agamben</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/84186" />
    <author>
      <name>Almeida, Davi da Costa</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/84186</id>
    <updated>2026-01-13T13:30:49Z</updated>
    <published>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Forma-de-vida e técnicas de si: problemas colocados à subjetividade a partir do pensamento de Michel Foucault e Giorgio Agamben
Autor(es): Almeida, Davi da Costa
Abstract: This research begins with the crisis emerging within the context of subjectivities, which&#xD;
permeates the bipolarities involving inside and outside, inclusion and exclusion, bios&#xD;
&#xD;
and zoe, qualified life and bare life, which separate life from its form and the form-of-&#xD;
life from life itself. The research problem unfolds as follows: how does Giorgio&#xD;
&#xD;
Agamben consider the construction of subjectivity; how does he envisage overcoming&#xD;
the limits imposed by bare life captured by the state of exception and marked by the&#xD;
desubjectification caused by biopolitical mechanisms; how does the philosopher&#xD;
envisage a form-of-life, a human life, completely removed from the clutches of law and&#xD;
a use of bodies and the world that never ends in appropriation? Therefore, the answers&#xD;
&#xD;
traverse the characterizations that involve the construction of the concepts "any-&#xD;
being," "remainder," and "form-of-life" in opposition to bare life; The concept of&#xD;
&#xD;
"messianic power" inverts the use of bodies and things, desecrating the sacredness of&#xD;
life and ideal and material things. Along with these questions, Michel Foucault's&#xD;
influence on the development of Agambenian studies is clearly evident. For Foucault,&#xD;
the subject is constituted by disciplinary and biopolitical operators and devices of&#xD;
control. For Agamben, the subject is the result of exception operators and biopolitical&#xD;
devices. Thus, the techniques of the self, a Foucauldian concept used to understand&#xD;
the construction of subjectivity, must be analyzed in conjunction with the emergence&#xD;
of these modern and contemporary devices. For Agamben, a "Form-of-Life" can be&#xD;
constructed in opposition to Bare Life, and therefore, it is necessary to understand how&#xD;
the techniques of the self are correlated with these processes and how such&#xD;
"techniques of the self" intertwine with biopolitical devices and exception operators.&#xD;
Therefore, the last Foucault in the history of sexuality is also the Foucault who will&#xD;
attempt to understand subjectivity as a more intimate construction of each individual&#xD;
within themselves, while simultaneously being a subjectivity permeated by the&#xD;
emergence of disciplines and biopower, and in Agamben's case, exception. The&#xD;
"techniques of the self" are procedures of governmentality that subjects themselves&#xD;
develop to produce their bodies, produce themselves, produce their subjectivities, and&#xD;
produce their truths. Thus, the problematic that revolved around the understanding of&#xD;
subjectivity in Agamben unfolds into the problematic of understanding subjectivity also&#xD;
from Foucault's perspective. That is: how the techniques of the self, or which&#xD;
techniques of the self, can constitute a new form-of-life; how forms of veridiction are&#xD;
&#xD;
correlated with the techniques of the self to construct a new form-of-life; how such an&#xD;
intertwining of forms of veridiction and the techniques of the self presents itself in&#xD;
extreme poverty; How do such techniques of the self and forms of veridiction correlate&#xD;
with messianic power? How do such techniques of the self contribute to and produce&#xD;
a new use of bodies beyond relations of appropriation and control? The objectives of&#xD;
this research are, at their core, to understand the form-of-life and its developments in&#xD;
relation to the exception in Agamben. That is, to identify the elements that allow us to&#xD;
define subjectivity for Agamben; to understand how the philosopher intends to&#xD;
transcend the limits imposed by bare life marked by processes of biopolitical&#xD;
desubjectification; to understand how it is possible in Agambenian thought to create a&#xD;
form-of-life, a human life, completely removed from the clutches of law, and a use of&#xD;
bodies and the world that is never reduced to a relationship of ownership or&#xD;
appropriation. The aim is also to understand the possible connections between&#xD;
Foucault's latest studies on the techniques of the self, the practices of the self, which&#xD;
involve technologies of the subject, and the development of the form-of-life in&#xD;
Agamben. For, in order to constitute a form-of-life, techniques of the self are necessary,&#xD;
whose truths of the self allow the subject to make himself, even if this form-of-life is&#xD;
constituted from the imponderable, the untimely.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2025-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

