<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/11528" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/11528</id>
  <updated>2026-06-01T05:17:09Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-01T05:17:09Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Mulheres, trabalho doméstico não remunerado e a colonialidade do cuidado: uma análise da política nacional de cuidados no Brasil</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86164" />
    <author>
      <name>Diógenes, Carla Marques</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86164</id>
    <updated>2026-05-08T15:02:58Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Mulheres, trabalho doméstico não remunerado e a colonialidade do cuidado: uma análise da política nacional de cuidados no Brasil
Autor(es): Diógenes, Carla Marques
Abstract: This thesis develops a critical analysis of Law nº 15.069/2024, which institutes the&#xD;
National Care Policy, investigating whether this new regulatory framework effectively&#xD;
confronts or merely modernizes the structures of gender, race, and class coloniality&#xD;
that have historically sustained the devaluation of unpaid care work in Brazil. The&#xD;
research problem stems from the structural paradox of peripheral modernity, wherein&#xD;
the activity essential for the reproduction of life is rendered invisible and compulsorily&#xD;
delegated to women, especially black and poor women, as a persistent legacy of a&#xD;
slave-holding and patriarchal social formation. The justification for the study is&#xD;
anchored in the social urgency imposed by the care crisis and population aging, the&#xD;
theoretical necessity to decolonize legal dogmatics, and the unprecedented nature of&#xD;
analyzing this legal statute through the lens of coloniality and intersectionality. The&#xD;
general objective of the research is to analyze how Law nº 15.069/2024 confronts or&#xD;
reproduces the structures of coloniality that permeate the devaluation and unequal&#xD;
distribution of unpaid care work in Brazil. The specific objectives are: a) to investigate&#xD;
the theoretical foundations of coloniality and its intrinsic relationship with the&#xD;
naturalization of unpaid care work in the Brazilian context; b) to examine the legislative&#xD;
drafting process, principles, guidelines, and management instruments provided for in&#xD;
Law nº 15.069/2024, identifying its advances and limitations; c) to evaluate, in light of&#xD;
intersectionality, if and how the National Care Policy proposes concrete mechanisms&#xD;
to recognize, value, and redistribute care work; d) to identify possible mechanisms of&#xD;
reproducing historical inequalities in the law's implementation; and e) to propose&#xD;
recommendations for the legal and institutional improvement of the National Care&#xD;
Policy, aiming at the construction of public policies that are truly emancipatory and&#xD;
decolonial, transcending mere welfarism. The methodology adopts a qualitative&#xD;
approach of a theoretical-critical nature, articulating a bibliographic review of decolonial&#xD;
thought and feminist economics with the documentary analysis of Law nº 15.069/2024&#xD;
and the interpretation of secondary data on the reality of care work in Brazil. Although&#xD;
Law nº 15.069/2024 represents an epistemic advance by defining care as work and a&#xD;
right, the final considerations of the thesis identify severe structural fragilities that&#xD;
threaten its purpose. In addition to the instability of financing, the risk is pointed out&#xD;
that the principle of progressive universalism may result in a selective and exclusionary&#xD;
11&#xD;
progressivity, prioritizing central areas and leaving Black and peripheral women, those&#xD;
most affected by time poverty, at the end of the service queue. In parallel, the emphasis&#xD;
on the compatibility between work and family as an end in itself is criticized, warning&#xD;
that without altering the exhaustive bases of the labor market and the sexual division&#xD;
of tasks, this logic tends to merely functionalize care for capitalist accumulation,&#xD;
allowing women to work longer hours in precarious jobs without being guaranteed real&#xD;
autonomy or quality of life.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A nova morfologia do trabalho, as múltiplas modalidades de ação coletiva e a necessidade de reconstrução do direito de greve</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85947" />
    <author>
      <name>Valentim, Gabriel Lima</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85947</id>
    <updated>2026-04-22T18:58:11Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: A nova morfologia do trabalho, as múltiplas modalidades de ação coletiva e a necessidade de reconstrução do direito de greve
Autor(es): Valentim, Gabriel Lima
Abstract: This research focuses on strikes, in their various manifestations, and on the right to&#xD;
strike. Its objective is to contribute to the construction of a new framework for the right&#xD;
to strike that is adequate to the new morphology of labor. The study is based on the&#xD;
premise that the transition from Fordist hegemony to the rise of flexible forms of&#xD;
production has produced profound transformations in the world of work. The working&#xD;
class, once centered on a relatively stable industrial proletariat, has given way to a new&#xD;
profile, predominantly located in the service sector and marked by flexible and&#xD;
precarious labor relations. In this context, new forms of collective mobilization have&#xD;
emerged, led by these workers, such as strikes without work stoppage, transnational&#xD;
strikes, political strikes, among other modalities of collective action. These forms of&#xD;
strike display characteristics that escape the traditional Fordist model of the right to&#xD;
strike, historically structured around work stoppage, strict legal requirements, purely&#xD;
professional demands, and the strong centrality of trade unions. It is from this mismatch&#xD;
between the contemporary reality of labor struggles and the prevailing legal&#xD;
configuration of the right to strike that the central question of this study arises: which&#xD;
guidelines should orient the reconstruction of the right to strike in light of the new&#xD;
morphology of labor? Although the Brazilian Federal Constitution, in Article 9,&#xD;
guarantees the right to strike through a relatively permissive wording, the exercise of&#xD;
this right is significantly constrained, especially by Law No. 7,783/1989 and by a&#xD;
restrictive body of judicial decisions. The Strike Law restricts the concept of strike to a&#xD;
classical form associated with Fordism, imposing requirements such as work&#xD;
stoppage, trade union participation, prior notice, and prior negotiation. In addition,&#xD;
judicial decisions not only reinforce these requirements but also introduce new&#xD;
restrictions, such as the prohibition of political strikes. The research adopts a&#xD;
hypothetical-deductive method, with a qualitative approach and an exploratory,&#xD;
explanatory, descriptive, and interpretative nature, based on bibliographic and&#xD;
documentary analysis. Grounded in a Marxist theoretical framework and critical theory,&#xD;
the study concludes that there is a need for a normative and interpretative&#xD;
reconstruction of the right to strike, either, in an ideal scenario, through the defense of&#xD;
a new right to strike free from the prerequisites imposed by the Strike Law, or through&#xD;
intermediate solutions based on flexible interpretations of existing legislation that allow&#xD;
for broader legal protection of contemporary forms of collective action.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Direito participativo-democrático: critérios para avaliação da democraticidade de instrumentos normativo-participativos na perspectiva municipal</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85893" />
    <author>
      <name>Gomes, Marcos Vinícius de Sousa Rocha</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85893</id>
    <updated>2026-04-16T10:29:26Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Direito participativo-democrático: critérios para avaliação da democraticidade de instrumentos normativo-participativos na perspectiva municipal
Autor(es): Gomes, Marcos Vinícius de Sousa Rocha
Abstract: In the Brazilian municipal context, the formal expansion of mechanisms for social participation, driven by the 1988 Constitution, coexists with institutional obstacles that limit the influence of civil society on public decision-making. It is within this mismatch between normative openness and decisional effectiveness that this research is situated, dedicated to examining the democratic&#xD;
quality of normative-participatory instruments, with particular attention to public policy councils. The research problem consists in assessing to what extent the legal-institutional design of these mechanisms, in the Municipality of Fortaleza, fosters or constrains their concrete realization, taking the local case as a unit of analysis capable of shedding light on dynamics observable in other large municipal arrangements. The empirical scope focuses on the local&#xD;
regulation of participation, from the Organic Law to the internal bylaws of the collegiate bodies. The thesis is linked to the concentration area “Constitution, Society and Legal Thought,” within the Research Line “Social Relations and Legal Thought,” in articulation with the broader project “Political Participation in the Democratic State.” The study adopts the hypotheticaldeductive method, with a qualitative approach supported by quantitative data, through&#xD;
bibliographic, jurisprudential, and documentary research, encompassing normative acts and meeting minutes. As an original contribution, the work organizes the concept of ParticipatoryDemocratic Law into four dimensions, procedural, substantive, interpretative, and dialectical, and, based on this framework, develops the Index of Democraticity of Municipal Participatory&#xD;
Instruments (IDPM), structured around 47 binary indicators distributed across five dimensions: inclusion and plurality; institutional autonomy; deliberation and agenda-setting; transparency and publicity; and procedural regularity. Applied to 30 councils in Fortaleza, the index demonstrates that broad normative provision coexists with deficits in autonomy and&#xD;
transparency. From this diagnosis emerges the analytical category of tutelary inclusion, understood as a pattern in which the presence of civil society is admitted, although its capacity to exert influence remains constrained by bureaucratic dependencies and low procedural visibility. The research also presents a proposal for a municipal model law to regulate participatory democracy, with the aim of translating analytical findings into objective&#xD;
parameters for institutional improvement, both in the local system and in other municipalities subject to analogous legal regimes. It concludes that the effectiveness of participatory democracy requires overcoming administrative tolerance and the model of tutelary inclusion, since citizen presence only acquires deliberative density when supported by a binding institutional design capable of preventing procedural capture and projecting participation as a&#xD;
structuring element of public policies.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Análise comparativa da negociação coletiva no Brasil e em Portugal: uma proposta de aprimoramento da regulamentação brasileira de prevalência do negociado sobre o legislado</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85493" />
    <author>
      <name>Bruxel, Charles da Costa</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85493</id>
    <updated>2026-03-27T14:48:36Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Análise comparativa da negociação coletiva no Brasil e em Portugal: uma proposta de aprimoramento da regulamentação brasileira de prevalência do negociado sobre o legislado
Autor(es): Bruxel, Charles da Costa
Abstract: The overall objective of this research is to formulate, considering the collective autonomy of will and the impossibility of collective bargaining becoming an instrument for the precariousness of labor relations, a concrete proposal for improving Brazilian regulations regarding the prevalence of collectively negotiated agreements over legislated law, based on a comparative analysis of Brazilian and Portuguese law. The specific objectives of this thesis are: to investigate the conditions for the prevalence of collectively negotiated agreements over legislated law in Portugal, based on international, constitutional, and legal aspects; to ascertain the conditions for the prevalence of collectively negotiated agreements over legislated law in Brazil, taking into account international, constitutional, and legal aspects; to compare the models of prevalence of collectively negotiated agreements over legislated law adopted in Brazil and Portugal, identifying similarities and differences in the treatment of the subject, and, taking into account delineated criteria, pointing out the successes and shortcomings of each country in dealing with the subject; to develop a concrete proposal, based on the Portuguese experience and the delineated criteria, for improvements to Brazilian regulations on the matter. This research is classified as basic, qualitative, explanatory, bibliographic, and documentary, and predominantly follows the comparative and deductive methods of scientific approach. After testing the hypotheses and conducting the analyses, it was concluded, in summary, that: although in Brazil and Portugal there is ample opportunity for negotiated agreements to prevail over legislation when collective bargaining does not suppress or diminish rights guaranteed by law, there is a maximum limit, albeit rarely applied, to the expansion of legislated rights; the validity of the prevalence of collectively negotiated agreements over legislated law in Portugal, when there is suppression/diminution of rights guaranteed by legislation, depends on respect for the minimum subsistence level for workers, which is substantially guaranteed by Portuguese law; the Portuguese model, in addition to guaranteeing greater scope for the doctrinal and jurisprudential definition of state norms that are part of the notion of a minimum subsistence level for workers that cannot be reduced/suppressed through collective bargaining, presents a broader minimum subsistence level for workers than the Brazilian one; the Brazilian minimum subsistence level for labor is not limited to the list in art. 611-B of the CLT&#xD;
8&#xD;
(Consolidation of Labor Laws); even when, in Brazil, it is abstractly possible to reduce or eliminate a certain legislated right through a collective bargaining agreement, the removal or limitation of the legislated right will only be valid, in practice, if the instrument brings proportionally beneficial counterparts to the worker; the proposed improvement of the Brazilian model of prevalence of collectively negotiated agreements over legislation involves ending the purported exhaustiveness of the list in art. 611-B of the CLT, importing the formula adopted by the CT/2009 (Labor Code of 2009), which makes the possibility of fitting legal norms within existing classification possibilities more open and dynamic, and expanding the scope of art. 611-B of the CLT. Finally, the methodology adopted proved satisfactory, making it possible to achieve the programmed objectives in depth.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

