Tratamento anaeróbio e microaeróbio de águas sintéticas contaminadas com BTEX

Abstract

The present study aimed to evaluate the use of biological reactors under anaerobic and microaerobic conditions, as an option of ex situ bioremediation of BTEX-contaminated waters. Initially, an analytical method for BTEX detection and quantification in waters and wastewaters, which consisted of headspace extraction followed by gas chromatography with detection by photoionization, was developed, optimized and validated. Subsequently, continuous-flow experiments were conducted in two mesophilic (27 °C) anaerobic reactors – one of them operated under methanogenic conditions and, afterwards, under microaerobic conditions, and the other one only under sulfidogenic conditions – a in order to determine the best operational condition for BTEX removal. The reactors were fed with water contaminated with BTEX (~3 mg·L-1 of each compound) and ethanol (co-substrate), and, depending on the redox condition evaluated, the effect of some operational parameters, such as hydraulic retention time (24, 36 and 48 h), effluent recirculation, co-substrate concentration, DQO/SO4 2- ratio and microaeration, was investigated in BTEX removal performance. Furthermore, the methanogenic reactor under microaerobic conditions was submitted to simulated situations of shock loading and absence of these compounds, and operational failures, such as system and microaeration shutdown to assess its robustness. Under methanogenic conditions, depending on the compound, removal efficiencies ranged from 38 to 97%. However, the increase of applied BTEX load, as a consequence of hydraulic detention time reduction from 48 to 24 h, seems to have adversely affected the removal process. Moreover, under methanogenic conditions, the effluent recirculation effect on BTEX removal was also assessed when high and low co-substrate (ethanol) concentrations were applied. For high ethanol concentrations, the impact of effluent recirculation was not evident since, probably, the high biogas production would have been sufficient to ensure effective mass transfer. Under sulfidogenic conditions, sulfate addition at different DQO/SO4 2- ratios did not change BTEX removal, which suggests sulfate-reducing bacteria would not be directly related to initial activation of aromatic compounds. Under microaerobic conditions, high BTEX removal efficiencies were achieved (> 90%). It is likely the addition of low oxygen concentrations has facilitated the initial activation of BTEX compounds, which is considered the limiting step of the anaerobic degradation process, mainly for benzene. Furthermore, the presence of high ethanol concentrations negatively affected BTEX removal, particularly for benzene, under the different redox conditions tested, since it is a preferentially degradable substrate when compared to the aromatic compounds. Finally, regarding the methanogenic reactor robustness under microaerobic conditions, the system could cope with BTEX load shocks although consecutive shocks have increased its recovery time. The period of BTEX absence seems to have negatively affected the reactor microbiota because the effluent quality deteriorated considerably after compounds reintroduction. The microaeration shutdown also negatively impacted the removal of BTEX, but the system recovered quickly after microaerobic conditions reestablishment.