Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/71382
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC Valor Lengua/Idioma
dc.contributor.authorRollemberg, Silvio Luiz de Sousa-
dc.contributor.authorBarros, Antônio Ricardo Mendes-
dc.contributor.authorLima, João Pedro Machado de-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Amanda Ferreira dos-
dc.contributor.authorFirmino, Paulo Igor Milen-
dc.contributor.authorSantos, André Bezerra dos-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-22T14:17:41Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-22T14:17:41Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationROLLEMBERG, Silvio Luiz de Sousa; BARROS, Antônio Ricardo Mendes; LIMA, João Pedro Machado de; SANTOS, Amanda Ferreira; FIRMINO, Paulo Igor Milen; SANTOS, André Bezerra dos. Influence of sequencing batch reactor configuration on aerobic granules growth: Engineering and microbiological aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, [S. l.], v. 238, n. 117906, p. 1-8, 2019.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0959-6526-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/71382-
dc.description.abstractThis work evaluated the effect of two sequencing batch reactor (SBR) configurations used for aerobic granular sludge (AGS) cultivation (conventional and constant-volume) on the physical and microbiological characteristics of the granules, as well as on the systems’ performance. In the conventional SBR (R1), the filling, reaction, settling and decanting phases occurred sequentially, while, in the SBR operated at constant volume (R2), the filling and decanting phases occurred simultaneously followed by the reaction and settling phases. A faster formation of granules (about 30 days) with a larger size (∅ > 1 mm) and better settleability (SVI30 ≈ 44.8 mL/g) was observed in R1. On the other hand, R2 presented a slower formation of granules (about 50 days) with a smaller diameter (∅ ≈ 0.8 mm) and a worse settleability (SVI30 ≈ 70.7 mL/g). Although R2 presented smaller granules (and longer time for biomass formation), this configuration presented several advantages, such as better system stability during the entire operation (125 days), higher solids retention, and granules with better physical resistance. In terms of performance, both systems presented high values of COD (>90%), NH4+ (>90%) and TN (>50%) removals after stabilization. However, the phosphorus removal in R2 was higher (≈50%) than in R1 (≈25%). The results justify the use of SBRs operated at constant volume in most full-scale AGS wastewater treatment plants, such as Nereda®. Therefore, the SBR configuration has a direct influence on the granule formation and its physical and microbiological characteristics as well as on the system performance in terms of efficiency and operational stability.pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherJournal of Cleaner Productionpt_BR
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopt_BR
dc.subjectAerobic granular sludgept_BR
dc.subjectConventional SBRpt_BR
dc.subjectConstant-volume SBRpt_BR
dc.subjectSimultaneous fill-and-draw modept_BR
dc.subjectSBR configurationpt_BR
dc.titleInfluence of sequencing batch reactor configuration on aerobic granules growth: Engineering and microbiological aspectspt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
Aparece en las colecciones: DEHA - Artigos publicados em revista científica

Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero Descripción Tamaño Formato  
2019_art_slsrollemberg2.pdf1,24 MBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Los ítems de DSpace están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.