Efeito agudo de dois diferentes métodos de treinamento resistido sobre variáveis hemodinâmicas em mulheres normotensas saudáveis

Abstract

Given the growth in resistance training practice and its positive repercussions in the non-drug treatment of arterial hypertension, it is known that this training has several methods used in its practice, but Given the growth in resistance training practice and its positive repercussions in the non-drug treatment of arterial hypertension, it is known that this training has several methods used in its practice, but there is no evidence-based basis for the risks associated with this use. The aim of the study was to investigate and compare the acute effect of two different resistance training methods on hemodynamic variables in healthy normotensive adult women. The sample consisted of 10 trained women, with a mean age of 33 years, who were exposed to an exercise protocol involving the drop-set and bi-set methods. In the drop-set method the 45 ° leg press device was used and in the bi-set method the 45 ° leg press device next to the extending chair, in both we adopted a moderate intensity with 75% RM with 2 ”for the concentric and eccentric phase movement and standard 2 'rest. The HR, PAS and DP showed a significant increase in their values for the three series in relation to rest values and a decrease in these values with the completion of the protocol as seen in the post values. The DBP showed constant values in the bi-set method and in almost the entire drop-set method, where a significantly lower value was observed in the 2nd series of this protocol. It is concluded that the drop-set and bi-set methods when used within the protocol adopted in the study, provide an answer to the hemodynamic variables below the risk indicators found in the literature without significant differences between these methods.