Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/34304
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorVasconcelos, Renata S.-
dc.contributor.authorSales, Raquel Pinto-
dc.contributor.authorMelo, Luíz H. de P.-
dc.contributor.authorMarinho, Liégina S.-
dc.contributor.authorBastos, Vasco P. D. B.-
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, Andréa da N. C.-
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Juliana C-
dc.contributor.authorHolanda, Marcelo A.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-20T17:43:19Z-
dc.date.available2018-07-20T17:43:19Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-
dc.identifier.citationVASCONCELOS, R. S. et al. Influences of duration of inspiratory effort, respiratory mechanics, and ventilator type on asynchrony with pressure support and proportional assist ventilation. Respiratory Care, Dallas, v. 62, n. 5, p. 550–557, may. 2017.pt_BR
dc.identifier.issn0020-1324-
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/34304-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Pressure support ventilation (PSV) is often associated with patient-ventilator asyn- chrony. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) offers inspiratory assistance proportional to patient effort, minimizing patient-ventilator asynchrony. The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of respiratory mechanics and patient effort on patient-ventilator asynchrony during PSV and PAV plus (PAV ). METHODS: We used a mechanical lung simulator and studied 3 respiratory mechanics profiles (normal, obstructive, and restrictive), with variations in the duration of inspiratory effort: 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 s. The Auto-Trak system was studied in ventilators when available. Outcome measures included inspiratory trigger delay, expiratory trigger asynchrony, and tidal volume (V T ). RESULTS: Inspiratory trigger delay was greater in the obstructive respiratory mechanics profile and greatest with a effort of 2.0 s (160 ms); cycling asynchrony, particularly delayed cycling, was common in the obstruc- tive profile, whereas the restrictive profile was associated with premature cycling. In comparison with PSV, PAV improved patient-ventilator synchrony, with a shorter triggering delay (28 ms vs 116 ms) and no cycling asynchrony in the restrictive profile. V T was lower with PAV than with PSV (630 mL vs 837 mL), as it was with the single-limb circuit ventilator (570 mL vs 837 mL). PAV mode was associated with longer cycling delays than were the other ventilation modes, especially for the obstruc- tive profile and higher effort values. Auto-Trak eliminated automatic triggering. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical ventilation asynchrony was influenced by effort, respiratory mechanics, ventilator type, and ventilation mode. In PSV mode, delayed cycling was associated with shorter effort in obstructive respi- ratory mechanics profiles, whereas premature cycling was more common with longer effort and a restrictive profile. PAV prevented premature cycling but not delayed cycling, especially in obstructive respiratory mechanics profiles, and it was associated with a lower V T . Key words: artificial respiration; respiratory mechanics; COPD; ARDS; mechanical ventilators . [Respir Care 2017;62(5):550–557. © 2017 Daedalus Enterprises]pt_BR
dc.language.isoenpt_BR
dc.publisherRespiratory Carept_BR
dc.subjectMecânica Respiratóriapt_BR
dc.subjectRespiratory Mechanicspt_BR
dc.subjectRespiração Artificialpt_BR
dc.subjectRespiration, Artificialpt_BR
dc.titleInfluences of duration of inspiratory effort, respiratory mechanics, and ventilator type on asynchrony with pressure support and proportional assist ventilationpt_BR
dc.typeArtigo de Periódicopt_BR
Aparece nas coleções:DMC - Artigos publicados em revistas científicas

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2017_art_rsvasconcelos.pdf610,46 kBAdobe PDFVisualizar/Abrir


Os itens no repositório estão protegidos por copyright, com todos os direitos reservados, salvo quando é indicado o contrário.