<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/4777" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/4777</id>
  <updated>2026-04-12T15:28:42Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-04-12T15:28:42Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Qualidade da gestão acadêmica e da docência em cursos de graduação: validando relações com o Conceito Preliminar de Cursos (CPC)</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/8594" />
    <author>
      <name>Lavor, João Ferreira de</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/8594</id>
    <updated>2021-10-01T13:49:26Z</updated>
    <published>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Qualidade da gestão acadêmica e da docência em cursos de graduação: validando relações com o Conceito Preliminar de Cursos (CPC)
Autor(es): Lavor, João Ferreira de
Abstract: This study addressed the issue of the teachinig quality of university level. To this end, we &#xD;
sought to identify the association that exists between the quality of management and teaching &#xD;
in undergraduate courses, with the results of the Concept Preliminary of Courses (CPC). &#xD;
Assessing the quality of undergraduate courses was treated using the aid of the model known &#xD;
by the anagram CIPP -context, inputs, processes and products, which covers the phases of &#xD;
planning and decision structuring, implementation and decisions recycling. For each of these &#xD;
moments there is a specific way of assessing it: (1) – Context evaluation; (2) – Inputs &#xD;
evaluation (input); (3) -Process evaluation and, finally, (4) – Product evaluation. This &#xD;
research was conducted on a sample of 35 undergraduate courses of the Federal University of &#xD;
Ceará (UFC), who possesses CPC, of a universe of 112 courses, divided into Lower Group ( &#xD;
CPC = 2 ), Average Group (2 &lt; CPC = 3), and Superior Group ( CPC &gt; 3 ). It was sent an &#xD;
email for 16,383 students regularly enrolled in the 35 courses sampled, yielding 1,433 &#xD;
respondents to the questionnaire for evaluating the teaching quality, and 1,178 respondents to &#xD;
the evaluation of academic management quality questionnaire. The results indicated that there &#xD;
is a positive association between the course quality and the CPC scores. With relation to &#xD;
academic management, it was found that the lower to the middle group there was a positive &#xD;
association, however from the median to the upper group, it was identified a decrease in the &#xD;
quality evaluated by students, demonstrating low management quality in academic courses of &#xD;
excellence. In the case of teaching, it was found that pedagogical planning was highly rated, &#xD;
while the opposite occurred in the classroom teaching practice. As an indication to future &#xD;
work are listed: a) further research on the implementation of classroom teaching practice, and &#xD;
b) investigate the reason for the identified low quality for the management in courses of &#xD;
excellence.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2014-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

