<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <title>DSpace Coleção:</title>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/23846" />
  <subtitle />
  <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/23846</id>
  <updated>2026-06-14T16:38:20Z</updated>
  <dc:date>2026-06-14T16:38:20Z</dc:date>
  <entry>
    <title>Eu Startup: a sutil arte de tornar-se empreendedor e o novo fantasma do capitalismo</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86550" />
    <author>
      <name>Thé, Raul da Fonseca Silva</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86550</id>
    <updated>2026-06-01T15:50:33Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Eu Startup: a sutil arte de tornar-se empreendedor e o novo fantasma do capitalismo
Autor(es): Thé, Raul da Fonseca Silva
Abstract: This work seeks to discuss the spread of entrepreneurial language throughout society, aiming to understand what entrepreneurship is and what it means to be an entrepreneur, within the framework of becoming. To this end, it associates two traditions with sociology, the conflict tradition and the symbolic interactionist tradition, to reformulate the Weberian interpretative scheme resulting from the discussion on the use of scale change for comprehensive processes, the micro-macro problem. In order to elaborate a scheme that contemplates, in a wave-like manner, structure, mobilized ideas, the dispute over the interiority of individuals, practices of adaptation and production of subjectivities, and the elaboration of societal reconstruction. The literature was consulted to observe the processes of reformulation of capitalism since the acute crisis of liberalism and the reformulation of liberalism into neoliberalism; passing through the constitution and deconstruction of passive welfare state and the process of hegemony of austro-american neoliberalism from the 1970 onwards; the text discuss the role of the active welfare state (workfare) and the establishment of the warfare state, both in the realm of sociability and austerity. It also debates the tradition of the “spirit of capitalism” in the social sciences, its reinterpretations, and research practices concerning it. Furthermore, it explore this unknown present, participating in both neoliberal hegemony and the reconfigurations of the “Spirit” — entrepreneurship. It finds that the literature fails to define it, much less see it as a permanent reflexive activity, a process of becoming. The narrative versions of entrepreneurship—emic, emic, and aesthetic—were consulted to better understand the scope of the reworking of the dispute over subjectivities in current capitalism and how this simultaneously shapes interiorities and societies/the State through the use of the language of becoming an entrepreneur. Through this, it is understood that capitalism reconfigures itself, not in another guise of the well-defined spirit of capitalism, but, through restlessness, signifying emptiness, and haunting, in the guise of the ghost of capitalism.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>A virtualização de práticas religiosas pentecostais na era digital</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86482" />
    <author>
      <name>Paiva, Daniele Alves</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86482</id>
    <updated>2026-05-26T16:35:25Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: A virtualização de práticas religiosas pentecostais na era digital
Autor(es): Paiva, Daniele Alves
Abstract: This study examines how contemporary Pentecostalism has produced new forms of religious sociability through the virtualization of its practices, incorporating digital technologies from other fields of social activity. A form of virtualized Pentecostalism has emerged as a significant phenomenon within the Pentecostal Christian religious landscape at the turn of the millennium, characterized by the adaptation of traditional Pentecostal practices to digital and virtualized environments. The emergence of this phenomenon is understood as the outcome of a long historical process involving successive abstractions and resignifications of the meanings of temple, presence, and access to the sacred. The empirical research was conducted across physical and virtual fields. The physical field comprised in-person visits to places of worship to observe religious rituals and interact with believers, including semi-structured, face-to-face interviews and questionnaires administered via Google Forms. The digital field involved the observation of Instagram profiles, participation in a WhatsApp group, and visits to a virtual church using an avatar to attend worship services. According to the evangelical participants, online worship services transmitted via live streaming and participation in WhatsApp support groups were among the primary strategies for coping with social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic and for maintaining religious practices. Beyond the intensive use of digital social networks, some churches implemented more structured processes of virtualization, exemplified by the creation of the virtual church Lagoverso as a virtual replica of a physical church. The study argues that virtualization exceeds the mere digitalization of social relations, as digitally mediated processes aim not only to connect individuals and generate new forms of interaction, but above all to produce immersive and quasi-autonomous virtual environments governed by their own rules of sociability and distinctive modes of religious practice.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Plataformas digitais e disputas políticas: da ascensão da extrema-direita ao enfrentamento proposto pela esquerda brasileira</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86374" />
    <author>
      <name>Martins, Maria Clara Ribeiro</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86374</id>
    <updated>2026-05-27T13:49:13Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Plataformas digitais e disputas políticas: da ascensão da extrema-direita ao enfrentamento proposto pela esquerda brasileira
Autor(es): Martins, Maria Clara Ribeiro
Abstract: This thesis investigates the political disputes that occur on digital platforms in the contemporary Brazilian context, focusing on the consolidation of the far-right in these spaces and the strategies of confrontation developed by the left. The study aims to analyze digital platforms not only as means of communication, but as products of the capitalist economy and as instruments that express the private interests of their owners, whose economic and political orientations materialize in the algorithmic structure and functioning. With a time frame focused primarily on the 2022 election period, the research takes platform X (formerly Twitter) as its main field of observation, analyzing Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Jair Bolsonaro as privileged agents in the political dispute that takes place in this space. Methodologically, the investigation is based on the constitution of a collection of data extracted from the platform, combined with the analysis of the content composed of publications, interactions, and narratives, interpreted from an interdisciplinary perspective. It is argued that the economic and political orientations of digital platforms favor certain forms of political action, especially the modus operandi of the far-right, which uses digital resources as mechanisms for mobilizing and uniting its electoral base, highlighting a structural asymmetry in these spaces. Given this scenario, and seeking to reverse the losses resulting from the 2018 electoral defeat, the Brazilian left is promoting a political restructuring in the 2022 election, through: 1) a confrontation marked by professionalization in the use of media; 2) the mobilization of a legal apparatus aimed at neutralizing opposing strategies; 3) the organization of a digital support network capable of contesting narratives in the so-called "digital guerrilla warfare"; and 4) the phenomenon known as cultural Janonism. Finally, it is evident that political disputes on digital platforms are not limited to election periods, constituting a permanent field of conflict and subject to changes that highlight its dynamic nature.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida Entidades: uma nova política habitacional?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85849" />
    <author>
      <name>Cavalcante, Vaneza Ferreira Araujo</name>
    </author>
    <id>http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85849</id>
    <updated>2026-04-15T13:05:45Z</updated>
    <published>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</published>
    <summary type="text">Título: Programa Minha Casa, Minha Vida Entidades: uma nova política habitacional?
Autor(es): Cavalcante, Vaneza Ferreira Araujo
Abstract: This research analyzes the "Minha Casa Minha Vida Entidades" (PMCMV-E) program in the city of Fortaleza, focusing on the self-management modality in social housing. The program stands out for centralizing social movements as protagonists in the housing process, encompassing everything from land acquisition and project conception to family selection, hiring of a technical team, and contracting a construction company. The study investigates the participation of these movements, using as its empirical field the Luiz Gonzaga Residential Complex, located on Rua Estrela de Ouro, in the Jangurussu neighborhood, on the outskirts of Fortaleza, Ceará. Inaugurated on November 2, 2019, the project was the result of a partnership between the Secretariat of Cities of the Government of the State of Ceará, the Municipality of Fortaleza, entities, and social movements linked to housing issues, such as Cearah Periferia, the Federation of Neighborhoods and Slums of Fortaleza, and Habitat for Humanity. Methodologically, I sought a close-up, insider's perspective as well as an outsider's, distant perspective (Magnani, 2002) to compose a posture of observation, listening, and writing (Oliveira, 1998). To this end, I used a field diary to record the observations gathered on-site. A qualitative/quantitative study was chosen. In the first, qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews were conducted with representatives of the organizing entities and with residents linked to social movements. In a second, quantitative phase, a questionnaire was applied to the residents of the housing complex, aiming to measure the level of satisfaction and perception regarding housing in the location. The theoretical foundation, based on authors who analyze the formation of Brazilian social housing and the understanding of the history of public housing policies in Brazil, highlights Topalov (1996), Azevedo (1988), Bonduki (1998), Gohn (1991), Oliveira (2006), Rizek (2014), Bollafi (1997), Blay (1985), Braga (1995), Gondim (2012), Pequeno (2008), Ponte (1993), Silva (1992), and Maricato (2011). The distinctive feature of the Luiz Gonzaga complex lies in its community organization, participatory management, and the strengthening of ties among residents. This integration transforms beneficiaries into active agents in the construction of the space, expanding the right to the city beyond the simple handing over of keys.
Tipo: Tese</summary>
    <dc:date>2026-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </entry>
</feed>

