http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/11524 2026-04-16T07:41:23Z 2026-04-16T07:41:23Z Gomes, Carlos Roberto de Miranda http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/61506 2021-10-26T16:58:54Z 1998-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Tipologia tributária: uma abordagem legal e doutrinária Autor(es): Gomes, Carlos Roberto de Miranda Tipo: Dissertação

1998-01-01T00:00:00Z Isidro, Bruno César Azevedo http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/61505 2021-10-26T16:50:52Z 2003-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Medida provisória e a imposição tributária Autor(es): Isidro, Bruno César Azevedo Abstract: The reseach wiII consider the issue of tax imposition through Presidencial Acts within the legal system in force. The importance of this work is mainly due to the adequacy of the theme, once the President Act is currently the most widely used nomative category and the taxation system and the nuances that sorround it, a landmark of the struggle that society has been fighting through law against the will of the Prince or State The relevance of the subject matter is observed when detailing whether the current legal system accepts the creation increasing, reduction or extintion of taxes through the use of Presidencial Acts, in fasturing the citizens guarantees aiming to demonstrate such impossibility in relation to the system built after the constitution of 1988 To reach the objectives proposed in this research the analitic - descriptive and the correlational procedure methods were used. The analysis carried out in the scope of the object of study led to the conclusion that, due to the new constitutional onder citizens have supreme garantees that protect them from the tax volitivity of executive power through the use of its exclusive legislative species, the Presidential Act exceptioning strictly legally supported hypotheses there is systematic prohibition of tax imposition through Presidencial Acts. Tipo: Dissertação

2003-01-01T00:00:00Z Magalhães, Victor Alves http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/51235 2020-04-13T12:23:23Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: História da legislação brasileira sobre ensino jurídico através dos currículos: análise comparativa com o desenvolvimento do primeiro curso de direito no Estado do Ceará Autor(es): Magalhães, Victor Alves Abstract: The purpose of this work was to describe the legislative development that dealt with the Brazilian legal education, since the debates of the Constituent of 1823 until the Resolution No. 5 of 2018 of the National Council of Education, through the prism of the curricula and the influences that these norms had. in one of the main and oldest law courses in the country, currently belonging to the Federal University of Ceará. Regarding the methodology, we used doctrinal bibliographic research related to the topics involving the teaching of law and its national history, primary sources that include reports and statistics from the government and researchers from higher education institutions, federal and state legislation on education. as well as records of debates and proceedings promoted by the legislature and organizations such as the Brazilian Bar Association. Regarding the results, it was found that the curriculum was given an essential role throughout the legislative history that dealt with legal education in the country, being commonplace attempts to change these to improve the quality of law courses, showing the case concrete study that such changes did not have the effects expected by the legislator. It was concluded that the focus given to curricula and their adaptations in the history of law teaching in Brazil, again, is being used as an attempt to improve the courses in contemporary times, while historical experience points to the ineffectiveness of this medium treated in isolation. It is possible to state that it is impossible to modify a panorama of more than 190 years of tradition, if other factors are not considered with the same or greater relevance than the curricula in this scenario, by all those who integrate the teaching of law in the country. Tipo: Dissertação

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z Azevedo, Thiago Pinheiro de http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/51233 2020-04-13T12:20:31Z 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Análise dos instrumentos coletivos de trabalho anulados no Ceará com ênfase nas cláusulas sociais: avanço ou retrocesso? Autor(es): Azevedo, Thiago Pinheiro de Abstract: Collective instruments embody the principle of autonomy of will and freedom of association. Once approved, they become autonomous sources of labor law seeking to meet the specificities of the parties involved in the negotiation, seeking to contribute both to better working conditions and to the development of economic activity. Therefore, collective instruments must be one of the means for social progress and for the dignity of the working class. However, in many negotiations between employers' and labor unions or between unions and companies - parties involved in the process - clauses of collective instruments are made that show social regression in labor relations, meeting the logical-formal and logical-material structure of the objectives, and constitutional foundations of democracy, human dignity and social justice. The Public Ministry of Labor, as guarantor of the constitutional guidelines and democratic principles, has been acting as guardian of the socially conquered rights of the worker, using Annulment Action, acting in the limitation of the negotiating power of the unions to effect the democratic aspirations foreseen in the Constitution Federal. Given this, the objective of this research was to investigate, in the jurisprudence of the Regional Labor Court of the 7th Region, to what extent the clauses of collective instruments, expunged by annulment actions, proposed by the Labor Public Prosecutor, violated the social fundamental rights achieved, using the inductive method and by observation and analysis in the concrete research of the judged. Several judgments of Ceará, mostly, and other courts, were analyzed in the period from 2007 to 2018, citing and commenting on various types of violations of rights won that occurred in the collective instruments negotiated before the 2017 labor reform (Law nº 13.467 / 2017), relating the injured law to the structure of ordering in its principles and valuing aspects. The results indicate that the regression of working conditions occurs, paradoxically, due to the responsibility of the labor union, due to the lack of organization, resistance and distancing of collective interests. It is also warned that such harmful practice tends to aggravate mainly with the advent of labor reform, which introduced several changes in art. 611-A, of the Consolidation of Labor Laws, allowing collective instruments to prevail over the law in some situations, adding, in addition, the insertion of the principle of minimum intervention that tries to restrict the range of possibilities of annulment actions. Tipo: Dissertação

2020-01-01T00:00:00Z