http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/112 2026-05-14T12:20:29Z 2026-05-14T12:20:29Z Menezes, Éric da Rocha de http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/85719 2026-04-08T20:09:49Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: O devido processo legal tecnológico na era da inteligência artificial: uma análise do sistema Athos no rito dos recursos repetitivos Autor(es): Menezes, Éric da Rocha de Abstract: This dissertation aims to analyze the integration of the Athos system into the repetitive appeals process and its compatibility with technological due process. It hypothesizes that the use of artificial intelligence in judicial decisions has conceptual, epistemological, and operational limitations, requiring constant and careful human supervision guided by the principles of transparency and explainability, the basis for the restructuring of due process, which now demands a technological dimension. In this scenario, Athos would not be in line with technological due process, requiring better incorporation of the principles of transparency and explainability in its operation. The term "artificial intelligence" has recently regained prominence, as this technology has become established in various sectors, both public and private, and in the daily lives of the population, facilitating repetitive tasks that once consumed human time. The Brazilian Judiciary, facing the significant challenge of mass litigation, quickly incorporated various AI systems into the procedural stages, including the decision-making phase. However, despite its positive impacts, such as the ability to analyze large databases in a short time, the tool is not infallible and has the potential to cause harm to those under its jurisdiction if the procedural system is not rethought. From this perspective, the research used the deductive method, through a qualitative approach to data analysis, collected using documentary and bibliographic research techniques, in order to verify whether the Athos system provides those under its jurisdiction with access to informative elements and the databases that compose it, in a comprehensible way, as well as an explanation, through visual elements or natural language, of the path taken to reach the result, demonstrating the criteria used. The investigation identified that AI systems are capable of correlating information to offer answers, but cannot effectively think. Artificial intelligence is a tool, with the legal nature of a legal good, capable of solving problems and overcoming obstacles, regardless of having consciousness. In light of this concept, the study focused on the standardization affecting AI systems, finding that, despite the existence of a new internationally established set of principles, Brazil still lacks a normative strategy for AI. The investigation revealed essential differences between the human knowledge process and that of AI systems, specifically regarding the risk of automation bias, which requires a new phase of justification. With respect to Athos, the study evaluated its creation and implementation, demonstrating the risk of simplifying appeal arguments through ngrams. The research identified that the incorporation of AI in the Judiciary demands the observance of transparency and explainability, resulting in a due technological legal process. Finally, the hypothesis was confirmed, considering that Athos does not provide litigants with information and explanations regarding the proposed new principles. Tipo: Dissertação

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Almeida, Mariane Araujo Lima de http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86253 2026-05-13T16:35:24Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: A construção jurídica da igualdade: uma análise das cotas de gênero na polícia militar do Ceará à luz do constitucionalismo feminista Autor(es): Almeida, Mariane Araujo Lima de Abstract: The legal construction of the principle of equality and its application in affirmative action policies is examined, with a particular focus on gender quotas in the Military Police of the State of Ceará. The analysis is grounded in the distinction between formal equality and substantive equality, in order to assess the constitutional legitimacy of affirmative measures aimed at promoting the inclusion of women in historically masculinized institutions. The study investigates whether gender quotas, within the context of state military corporations, constitute an effective instrument for the realization of substantive equality or whether they paradoxically operate as mechanisms that restrict women’s access. Methodologically, the research adopts a qualitative approach of an exploratory and analytical-interpretative nature, relying on bibliographic and documentary research encompassing constitutional and infra-constitutional norms, judicial decisions, institutional data, and specialized literature in feminist constitutional theory and law. The theoretical framework is grounded in feminist constitutionalism, understood as a critical hermeneutical method capable of revealing the gendered dimensions embedded in the production, interpretation, and application of law. The study also examines the case law of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court concerning affirmative action and recent decisions affecting the constitutionality of gender quotas within military corporations. It concludes that, although gender quotas may assume an inclusive function, their effectiveness depends on a constitutional interpretation committed to substantive equality, as well as on the adoption of complementary structural measures aimed at ensuring women’s retention, professional advancement, and the overcoming of symbolic and institutional inequalities that affect women in military careers. Tipo: Dissertação

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Diógenes, Carla Marques http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86164 2026-05-08T15:02:58Z 2026-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Mulheres, trabalho doméstico não remunerado e a colonialidade do cuidado: uma análise da política nacional de cuidados no Brasil Autor(es): Diógenes, Carla Marques Abstract: This thesis develops a critical analysis of Law nº 15.069/2024, which institutes the National Care Policy, investigating whether this new regulatory framework effectively confronts or merely modernizes the structures of gender, race, and class coloniality that have historically sustained the devaluation of unpaid care work in Brazil. The research problem stems from the structural paradox of peripheral modernity, wherein the activity essential for the reproduction of life is rendered invisible and compulsorily delegated to women, especially black and poor women, as a persistent legacy of a slave-holding and patriarchal social formation. The justification for the study is anchored in the social urgency imposed by the care crisis and population aging, the theoretical necessity to decolonize legal dogmatics, and the unprecedented nature of analyzing this legal statute through the lens of coloniality and intersectionality. The general objective of the research is to analyze how Law nº 15.069/2024 confronts or reproduces the structures of coloniality that permeate the devaluation and unequal distribution of unpaid care work in Brazil. The specific objectives are: a) to investigate the theoretical foundations of coloniality and its intrinsic relationship with the naturalization of unpaid care work in the Brazilian context; b) to examine the legislative drafting process, principles, guidelines, and management instruments provided for in Law nº 15.069/2024, identifying its advances and limitations; c) to evaluate, in light of intersectionality, if and how the National Care Policy proposes concrete mechanisms to recognize, value, and redistribute care work; d) to identify possible mechanisms of reproducing historical inequalities in the law's implementation; and e) to propose recommendations for the legal and institutional improvement of the National Care Policy, aiming at the construction of public policies that are truly emancipatory and decolonial, transcending mere welfarism. The methodology adopts a qualitative approach of a theoretical-critical nature, articulating a bibliographic review of decolonial thought and feminist economics with the documentary analysis of Law nº 15.069/2024 and the interpretation of secondary data on the reality of care work in Brazil. Although Law nº 15.069/2024 represents an epistemic advance by defining care as work and a right, the final considerations of the thesis identify severe structural fragilities that threaten its purpose. In addition to the instability of financing, the risk is pointed out that the principle of progressive universalism may result in a selective and exclusionary 11 progressivity, prioritizing central areas and leaving Black and peripheral women, those most affected by time poverty, at the end of the service queue. In parallel, the emphasis on the compatibility between work and family as an end in itself is criticized, warning that without altering the exhaustive bases of the labor market and the sexual division of tasks, this logic tends to merely functionalize care for capitalist accumulation, allowing women to work longer hours in precarious jobs without being guaranteed real autonomy or quality of life. Tipo: Tese

2026-01-01T00:00:00Z Cavalcanti, Maria das Dores Carneiro http://repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/86099 2026-04-30T15:20:34Z 2005-01-01T00:00:00Z

Título: Direito e processo do trabalho: garantias constitucionais e infraconstitucionais do direito processual trabalhista e a harmonização dos fatores da produção Autor(es): Cavalcanti, Maria das Dores Carneiro Tipo: Dissertação

2005-01-01T00:00:00Z